My previous post (the post added earlier today) made me think of the first signature assignment I prepared at NCU, which was on online reviews. While preparing that signature assignment, I learned that a consumer review is considered more believable if it is balanced or neutral. One-sided reviews are not as believable. The analysis provided additional information on why a review may be one-sided. A review may be one-sided or biased because of the reviewer's field of specialization, beliefs, or background/experiences. The motivation for some of the reviews seemed to be to contribute to the discussion or add their "two cents." The intent was not always clear. It is interesting that the concept map I prepared as a step towards the signature assignment - based on selected papers in the literature - did not provide much information on intent. (Link to concept map: https://fahmeenaodetta.blogspot.com/2022/06/signature-assignment-on-online-reviews.html)
I found an article (research) on the PhD experience. I did not know there was research on this.
FEATURED POST - To view full post, click the title below
Usability - More explanation
Usability is a challenging topic and there are outstanding, capable professionals in the field (See my post on renowned usability expert J. ...
I completed 11 signature assignments - significant papers with original ideas. In one paper, I foresaw specific problems at a major company. In another, I designed a study (with statistical analyses) to explain why videos do not significantly enhance or improve online reviews. I worked alone. My signature assignments available at: https://fahmeenaodettasignaturepapers.tumblr.com
-------------------------------------POSTS:-------------------------------------
Thursday, August 24, 2023
Reviews
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment